Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-8081-

Open-source touhou clone

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-24 15:35

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-24 17:03

More of this, please.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-24 17:20

Jesus Christ, they somehow managed to make illustrations even worse than ZUN's. Besides that, even if the Touhou games are themselves proprietary, the assets are basically public domain, thus why it has such a large fandom, doesn't it? Even if not explicitly a free license, it kind of is, in an honorary way.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-24 17:21

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-24 17:56

>>4
Already know of that one.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-24 18:31

>>3
at first I thought you were joking, but then I opened it and was horrified. This has to be ironically bad.
At least the sprites are nice.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-25 17:46

>>3
youmu looks like a guy too

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-25 23:59

The illustrations are not code, thus nobody cares if they are "open" or not.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 0:11

>>8

implying there is any between code and data.

also, these hentai pics could serve as a code forcing you to click links and masturbate. Think about it, dolt. You're no smarter than my CPU.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 2:04

>>9
Who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 2:06

>>3
Might as well just release the assets under Cc0.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 3:04

>>10

Code is data, dolt.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 3:15

>>12
Okay, sure, but who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 4:46

>>13
the implications

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 5:03

>>14
That is a complete non-sequitur.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 6:29

Data is not code, dolt.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 9:48

>>16
But code is data.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 13:37

>>17
And?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 13:53

>>18
Code is data but data isn't code.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 14:59

Buffer overflouhou

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 16:27

>>16

Data can be interpreted as code.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 16:36

>>19
Data can be contained within code.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 17:12

Terrible!

They should have made that game with a CURRENT YEAR programming language like python or javascript + electron. That way they could have used the time saved by not dealing with low level C nonsense learning how to make good art instead.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 17:35

>>23
I can't tell whether or not this post is sarcastic.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 18:08

>>24
that's Edgar Poe's law

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 19:18

>>19
Did anyone claim otherwise? Dolt.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 4:44

>>26
Yes. >>18 prompted the question, which in turn elicited my answer.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 5:36

>>23
Using a horrible language like C is like summoning Satan. All of these C programmers are literally minions of Satan.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 6:08

>>23
That way they could have used the time saved by not dealing with low level C nonsense learning how to make good art instead
it's open sores. it's not about making something nice. there's no profit motive. it's all about ego and stroking themselves about how they can do pointer indirection like it's 1969.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 6:11

>>23
Or he could have paid someone to make them for cheap.
I mean the character sprites look normal, but I doubt it would have been expensive to order a few charater art.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 6:59

>>30
It seems like a lot of programmers literally just don't have the capacity to distinguish good art from the bad--not in the sense that one is more evocative than the other, but even the neurotypical layman can tell when a practitioner represents our natural world well through depictions of anatomy, plants, etc., although they aren't so perceptive to the shameless shortcuts many intermediate DA artists abuse. I was wondering about maybe offering him my own illustrations to him (not to say they're good, but they're better then his, and I figured a small project like this would be a cool stepping stone for my portfolio), but then I began to wonder if he actually likes it that way and would be insulted by my solicitations. It's not the first time that's happened to me. And I'd like to think I'm reasonably good at telegraphing humility and graciousness and general dick-suckery in my contacting prospective ``employers''.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 12:19

The art is awful. However, the game runs very well and seems good.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 14:23

>>32
It's open source, so fix the art yourself ;)))

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 14:40

>>31

implying programmers can't use ruler tool to measure proportions

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 16:42

>>34
You're basically namefagging at this point. I'd tell you to stop trying to force your stupid imagereddit memes, except no one's doing it other than you, and no one even cares enough to call you out anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 16:50

>>35
he thinks only one poster does this

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 17:27

>>36
Are you implying that there's more than one? Because you're just lying to yourself. It's so blatantly obvious from the newline you always make after the quotelink. You might as well be one person; to imply anything else would also be suggesting a hivemind capable of such mediocrity.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 17:40

>>37
It's so blatantly obvious from the newline you always make after the quotelink.
As far as I know, all of Nikita's confirmed posts look like that.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 18:49

>>37
Stop giving him hints about how to hide himself, thank you.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 19:21

>>37

It's so blatantly obvious from the newline you always make after the quotelink.

lol you have finally discovered it!

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 19:23

>>40
Nobody ``discovered it'', we all knew from the start, you retard. And we also knew that you would change that up so as to create the illusion of multiple retards.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 20:22

>>41 fuck you and your ugly waifu!

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 21:19

whatever happened to steve?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 22:49

>>34,36
Who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 23:58

asking who they are quoting

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 0:20

>>45
Who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 0:21

being this dense

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 0:31

>>47
Who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 0:35

whatever

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 0:36

>>23,29
So just hire someone to do a better job with the artwork.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 0:39

>>49
Who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 0:43

>>51
not realizing I'm quoting his mum

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 0:46

>>52
Who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 1:49

Toe hoe: I pay the faeries with honey and in return I get to impregnate their toes.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 2:06

>>54
Toe hoe
Is that really how it's pronounced? Haha.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 2:22

>>55
if your faggot.....

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 2:42

>>53
implying

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 2:47

>>57
Who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 3:18

>>58
implying

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 4:03

>>59
Who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 4:14

>>60
implying

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 7:46

>>61
Who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 8:56

>>62
implying

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 8:58

>>42
shut up nikiketa, you'll never know true love you dumb bydlo.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 9:26

>>33
Agreed.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 9:28

>>63
implying

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 9:30

>>66
implying

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 13:31

>>63,66-67
Who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 15:41

>>68
>>67 is quoting >>66, who is in turn being a retard.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 18:04

>>68
implying
>>69
implying

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 19:05

>>70
Who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 19:27

>>70
Who are you cloning?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 20:04

>>71
implying

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 20:40

>>73
Who you quote?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 20:41

>>74
Me quote implications.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 20:41

>>75
No quote implications; quote people.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 20:42

>>76
``no''

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 20:43

>>74-77
Get a life you dumb retard. Stop posting within a few minutes of yourself pretending like it's not yourself.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 20:44

>>77
implication

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 21:54

>>78
Wow, you really saw past my amazing ruse. I was so sure I tricked everyone with my blatant prose and small time window, but you, Master Detective, with perfect grammar called me out on my devilish farce. And to what end, might I ask, could I possibly have for deceiving everyone? You'll need motive if you want to try me in a court of law. ... Or could it possibly be that I was joking? Well, I guess you won, anyway, for bumping a thread that was already at the top.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 22:54

>>1-80
all me

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 23:28

>>1-81
Samefag.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 23:37

>>79
Who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-29 0:53

>>83
implying implications

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-29 0:58

>>84
Who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-29 1:14

Can we get back to talking about the Touhou game, please?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-29 1:19

>>85
implying

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-29 2:01

>>88
implying

Name: /lounge/ 2017-12-29 3:16

>>89
What is this ``implying'' a quote from? Can you provide a source?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-29 3:49

>>90
You're an anus.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-29 6:17

>>91
My name isn't Sébastien.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-29 10:13

>>86
Nope. Just like the Hooktube derails, no thread is safe from the ``implying/who are you quoting?'' debate, no matter how good that thread might be. But who is responsible for derailing the thread, you might ask? If you ask one side, they blame the other, and vice versa. And so they shamelessly carry on with this neverending debate, never once taking a second to wonder as to whether or not what they're doing is worth the time invested.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-29 13:44

>>93
If you ask one side, they blame the other, and vice versa.
Both sides are the same person.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-29 14:40

>>94
>>74-77 is clearly not the same people that are arguing over quotes. It was an obvious bad joke by one person.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-29 15:57

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-29 17:17

>>96
I wonder if WebAssembly will ever be as viable an artistic platform as Flash. Everyone keeps talking about it, but I still have no idea what it really is.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-29 21:57

>>96
Not as good as the one in OP.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-29 22:06

>>98
Not as good as my dubs.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-29 23:16

>>97
Flash has already been superseded by html5
All major browsers will end support for flash pretty soon

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-29 23:40

>>100
Flash has already been superseded by html5
You say that--and you're right, as far as practical things go. html5 implementing DRM has de facto deprecated Flash as far as practical necessity, but I still wonder about artists who might not necessarily be able to handle nor care for writing in WA or however the hell it works. The entry bar for Flash was extremely low, and that's what made such a blossoming scene. It might be technically true that html5 can do anything Flash could do better, but through what means? Is there really a true, modern counterpart for Flash? When push comes to shove, and, say, I was a Flash artist, what the hell am I supposed to do, now, as Flash animations/games return to being a niche thing? Also, I think all browsers except lts releases have dropped Flash support by this point.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-30 0:20

>>99
Back to 4chan, please.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-30 0:23

>>101
I eventually see all flash content being converted into HTML5 video at some point.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-30 0:34

>>103
That's not an easy task.
It's a real shame Shumway isn't going to be updated any time soon.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-30 16:01

>>103
All?
Unlikely.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-30 17:08

I was going to write a response, but then I realized that all of you would just ignore whatever I would have to say, anyways. And it doesn't help that none of you know what you're talking about.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-30 20:18

>>106
Yes, you'd better fuck off anyway.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-31 13:36

C
Wouldn't it be better to make it in sepples?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-31 19:02

>>108
You best be joking.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-31 19:38

>>109
And yet I am not.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-31 19:41

>>110
Well, then that's just sad if you think it would be better to make the game in
SEPPLES
. You have a lot to learn.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-31 19:46

>>107
Rude!

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-01 3:43

>>111
Not him, but why do people program video games mostly in it if it's worse?

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-01 5:12

>>113
Because lots of people have been taught terrible programming practices Popularity ≠ quality.

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-01 5:20

>>113
Nobody writes a video game in order to prove their programming excellence. You can throw +10 video game programmers at a wall, and you can expect a basically linear trend as to how long it would take to finish a video game project, because video games are fundamentally simple, regardless of scale. Because when you write a video game, you already have a solution in mind: what your artists want. Video programmers are just practitioners who are subservient to their directors and the artist by proxy. Which isn't inherently bad, but it's a totally different paradigm, part of the reason why Wine can very easily emulate many video games but not a lot of practical software like office suites without a lot of complicated hooks and direct effort from their developers.

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-01 7:46

>>108
Yes, it would be better.

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-01 15:11

>>108
better
I don't know about better, but probably easier.

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-07 15:15

Just played it, here are my findings: It's ass.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List